Free Access
| Issue |
E.J.E.S.S.
Volume 14, Number 4, 2000
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 347 - 363 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ejess:2000102 | |
DOI: 10.1051/ejess:2000102
European Journal of Economic and Social Systems 14
N
4 (2000) pp. 347-363
From procedural to complex rationality relations: Observed system and observing system
Anne Isla
Lereps, Université des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse, Manufacture des tabacs,
21 allée de Brienne, 31000 Toulouse, France
Abstract:
Procedural rationality and substantive rationality call for two different approaches
in terms of methodology and epistemology. While in the first case, the question of
interest is "what is it made of?'' The appropriate methodology is analytic and the
epistemology, positivist. In the second case, the question will be "what does it make,
and why?'' the methodology complex and the epistemology, constructivist. The object of
study will be different in both cases. The choice of a methodology also reflects a
different view of uncertainty. As a consequence, it is impossible to use simultaneously
the two rationality concepts and to study the behavior of an economic agent. How can we
then classify the economical theories according to either one of the rationality concept
and reasoning approach (complex or analytic)? The Economics of Convention School,
developed in France, offers a conceptual framework consistent with a complex approach.
It still has to adhere to that complex approach in a more total way, by assuming the
economist observer's projects and aims.
Keywords:
Methodology, epistemology, constructivism, complexity, rationality
Correspondence and reprints: Anne Isla
E-mail: isla@univ-tlse1.fr
Copyright EDP Sciences 2001